跳转到帖子

Debian: CVE-2024-45022: linux, linux-6.1 -- security update

recommended_posts

发布于
  • Members

Debian: CVE-2024-45022: linux, linux-6.1 -- security update

Severity
5
CVSS
(AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C)
Published
09/11/2024
Created
10/08/2024
Added
10/07/2024
Modified
01/30/2025

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/vmalloc: fix page mapping if vm_area_alloc_pages() with high order fallback to order 0 The __vmap_pages_range_noflush() assumes its argument pages** contains pages with the same page shift.However, since commit e9c3cda4d86e ("mm, vmalloc: fix high order __GFP_NOFAIL allocations"), if gfp_flags includes __GFP_NOFAIL with high order in vm_area_alloc_pages() and page allocation failed for high order, the pages** may contain two different page shifts (high order and order-0).This could lead __vmap_pages_range_noflush() to perform incorrect mappings, potentially resulting in memory corruption. Users might encounter this as follows (vmap_allow_huge = true, 2M is for PMD_SIZE): kvmalloc(2M, __GFP_NOFAIL|GFP_X) __vmalloc_node_range_noprof(vm_flags=VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP) vm_area_alloc_pages(order=9) ---> order-9 allocation failed and fallback to order-0 vmap_pages_range() vmap_pages_range_noflush() __vmap_pages_range_noflush(page_shift = 21) ----> wrong mapping happens We can remove the fallback code because if a high-order allocation fails, __vmalloc_node_range_noprof() will retry with order-0.Therefore, it is unnecessary to fallback to order-0 here.Therefore, fix this by removing the fallback code.

Solution(s)

  • debian-upgrade-linux
  • debian-upgrade-linux-6-1

References

  • https://attackerkb.com/topics/cve-2024-45022
  • CVE - 2024-45022
  • DSA-5782-1
  • 查看数 692
  • 已创建
  • 最后回复

参与讨论

你可立刻发布并稍后注册。 如果你有帐户,立刻登录发布帖子。

游客
回帖…